Abstract

 
 

References (12)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Procedures for Office Analysis: a Critical Review


William C. Sasso


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Judith Reitman Olson


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Alan G. Merten


affiliation not provided to SSRN

April 1986

NYU Working Paper No. IS-86-31

Abstract:     
Because office automation has not fulfilled its promise of making work more productive andsatisfying, researchers have developed techniques for specifying better requirements for officeautomation and support. Four such office analysis techniques have been publicly proposed, differingin how much of the complete analysis-to-prescription cycle they cover, what aspects they analyze,and how they bound the "office." Review of these analysis processes points to three key issues:1. Office analysis is weak on prescribing specific support/automationproducts;2. we do not know how to evaluate different analysis techniques; and3. we have not yet specified the criteria by which we would decide whichtechnique is good.In answer to these issues, we suggest that extensions of some promising schemes forprescribing specific products be explored; that techniques be compared using an efficient "transcriptexperiment" approach; and that the criteria for acceptability for an analysis method be that itsdescriptions be reliable and valid, and that its prescriptions be valuable to the workers in thereorganized, computer-supported office.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 31, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Sasso, William C., Reitman Olson, Judith and Merten, Alan G., Procedures for Office Analysis: a Critical Review (April 1986). Information Systems Working Papers Series, Vol. , pp. -, 1986. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290083

Contact Information

William C. Sasso (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Judith Reitman Olson
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Alan G. Merten
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 111
Downloads: 10
References:  12
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds