Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290243
 
 

Footnotes (118)



 


 



Second Thoughts


Gregory Mitchell


University of Virginia School of Law

October 20, 2008

McGeorge Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Biases in judgment and decision-making often arise at the level of first-order thoughts. If these initial thoughts are not overridden by second-order thoughts, they may lead to biased outputs. Current psychological models of legal actors assume that individuals are largely incapable of overcoming these first-order biasing thoughts and that these thoughts consequently lead to irrational and discriminatory behaviors. These models ignore considerable evidence that individuals often naturally engage in self-correction and that situational pressures often encourage self-correction. I discuss the conditions under which self-correction may occur and the possibilities and limits for the law in promoting self-correction to overcome biased judgments, decisions, and behavior.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Implicit Bias, Metacognition, Rationality, Behavioral Law and Economics, Antidiscrimination Law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Mitchell, Gregory, Second Thoughts (October 20, 2008). McGeorge Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290243

Contact Information

Gregory Mitchell (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-7354 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 782
Downloads: 150
Download Rank: 110,004
Footnotes:  118

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds