University of Virginia School of Law
October 20, 2008
McGeorge Law Review, Forthcoming
Biases in judgment and decision-making often arise at the level of first-order thoughts. If these initial thoughts are not overridden by second-order thoughts, they may lead to biased outputs. Current psychological models of legal actors assume that individuals are largely incapable of overcoming these first-order biasing thoughts and that these thoughts consequently lead to irrational and discriminatory behaviors. These models ignore considerable evidence that individuals often naturally engage in self-correction and that situational pressures often encourage self-correction. I discuss the conditions under which self-correction may occur and the possibilities and limits for the law in promoting self-correction to overcome biased judgments, decisions, and behavior.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: Implicit Bias, Metacognition, Rationality, Behavioral Law and Economics, Antidiscrimination LawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 28, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds