Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290770
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (214)



 


 



Justice Stevens and the Rule of Reason


Spencer Weber Waller


Loyola University of Chicago, School of Law - Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies

October 27, 2008

Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 61, 2009

Abstract:     
Over the past thirty plus years Justice Stevens has played a special role in the jurisprudence of antitrust. He came to the Supreme Court after a successful career as an antitrust litigator, scholar, law teacher, and federal appellate judge. Justice Stevens applied the special insights this background provided to articulate a unique voice in shaping antitrust. While much of the antitrust debate since World War II has concerned the proper legal standard for assessing the competitive impact of agreements under the antitrust laws, Justice Stevens has focused much of his analytical work for the Court on a more sophisticated, but no less important, question - how should a court actually determine whether an agreement unreasonably restricts competition in violation of the antitrust laws. In antitrust terms, the question for Stevens was not so much whether the per se rule or the rule of reason applied in a particular case, but what does the rule of reason actually mean and how should it be applied.

In this article, I examine the distinctive voice Justice Stevens brought to antitrust, some of the personal and professional influences that created this voice; and the impact of Justice Stevens on the antitrust jurisprudence of the Supreme Court in defining the rule of reason and its application. I argue that Stevens, more than any Justice, helped define the rule of reason as a single unitary continuum in analyzing agreements under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and further defined what counted as potential legitimate justifications under the rule.

Part I lays out Justice Stevens's student and early professional career and the influence that Professor James Rahl of Northwestern University School of Law had on Justice Stevens and his antitrust philosophy. Part II analyzes the litigation practice, scholarly writing, and limited antitrust appellate opinions of then Judge Stevens for further clues as to his evolving antitrust philosophy. Part III examines the numerous Supreme Court opinions authored by Justice Stevens which analyze the critical issue of what the rule of reason actually means when it applies in a case. Finally, I conclude that Justice Stevens' most important contribution in antitrust was to redefine the rule of reason from an empty analytical box in which defendants automatically prevailed into the core tool of modern antitrust law in which courts conduct a more meaningful analysis of the competitive impact of agreements.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Justice Stevens, John Paul Stevens, James Rahl, antitrust, Sherman Act, rule of reason, competition, competitive effects

JEL Classification: D4, K21, L4

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 29, 2008 ; Last revised: July 8, 2009

Suggested Citation

Waller, Spencer Weber, Justice Stevens and the Rule of Reason (October 27, 2008). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 61, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1290770

Contact Information

Spencer Weber Waller (Contact Author)
Loyola University of Chicago, School of Law - Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-915-7137 (Phone)
312-915-7201 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,971
Downloads: 289
Download Rank: 59,805
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  214

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds