Restrictions on Credit: A Public Policy Analysis of Payday Lending
Petru S Stoianovici
Charles River Associates (CRA)
Michael T. Maloney
Clemson University - John E. Walker Department of Economics
October 28, 2008
Using state level data between 1990 and 2006, we find no empirical evidence that payday lending leads to more bankruptcy filings, which casts doubt on the debt trap argument against payday lending. We capture the intensity of the payday lending activity in a state by the number of payday lending stores. We control for restrictions on payday lenders by including into the analysis six variables that we construct that rank legislative provisions across states and across time. We use two different estimation procedures: difference-in-difference and Granger causality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: payday lending, payday loan, short term unsecured loan, cash advance, deferred deposit loan, personal bankruptcy, bankruptcy, subprime credit market, consumer finance, household finance
JEL Classification: D12, D18, D69, G28, G29, K23
Date posted: October 29, 2008 ; Last revised: July 20, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds