Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (3)



 


 



Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Based on Counsel's Alleged Fourth Amendment Failures


John Burkoff


University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Nancy M. Burkoff


University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

October, 28 2008

Search & Seizure Law Report, Vol. 30, p. 41, 2003
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper

Abstract:     
Criminal defense counsel's failure to move to suppress evidence allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may be the basis for an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim raised on appeal or in a petition for habeas corpus relief. The framework governing review of such claims is complex, however, and appellants' and petitioners' ineffective assistance claims are generally unsuccessful. Professors John and Nancy Burkoff discuss the recent decisional law on this subject.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: right to counsel, ineffective assistance, sixth amendment, suppression motions, exclusionary rule

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Burkoff, John and Burkoff, Nancy M., Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Based on Counsel's Alleged Fourth Amendment Failures (October, 28 2008). Search & Seizure Law Report, Vol. 30, p. 41, 2003; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1291357

Contact Information

John Burkoff (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Nancy M. Burkoff
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-624-2009 (Phone)
412-648-2648 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.pitt.edu/faculty/profiles/burkoffnm

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 419
Downloads: 37
Footnotes:  3

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.359 seconds