Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1291462
 
 

Footnotes (55)



 


 



Government Workers and Government Speech


Helen L. Norton


University of Colorado School of Law

October 28, 2008

First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 7, 2008

Abstract:     
This essay, to be published in the First Amendment Law Review's forthcoming symposium issue on Public Citizens, Public Servants: Free Speech in the Post-Garcetti Workplace, critiques the Supreme Court's decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos as reflecting a distorted understanding of government speech that overstates government's own expressive interests while undermining the public's interest in transparent government.

In Garcetti, the Court held that the First Amendment does not protect public employees' speech made "pursuant to their official duties," concluding that a government employer should remain free to exercise "employer control over what the employer itself has commissioned or created." The Court thus created a bright-line rule that essentially defines public employees' speech delivered pursuant to their official duties as the government's own speech for which it paid with a salary - i.e., speech that the government may control free from First Amendment scrutiny regardless of the strength of the public's interest in it or its impact, if any, on the government's efficiency.

But in suggesting that any speech pursuant to a public employee's official duties constitutes government speech, the Court ignored the fact that government speech merits insulation from First Amendment scrutiny only because of its instrumental value in enabling the public to identify and evaluate its government's priorities - and to hold the government politically accountable for those choices. Indeed, the government's political accountability to the electorate for its effectiveness is undercut by the carte blanche Garcetti now gives government to discipline workers who truthfully report irregularities and improprieties pursuant to their official duties. Rather than identifying a theoretically principled approach for capturing the value of empowering government to control its own speech, the Garcetti Court instead formalistically imposed a bright-line rule to avoid the often challenging but entirely commonplace task of balancing constitutional interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: First Amendment, public employees, government speech, civil rights

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 29, 2008 ; Last revised: November 24, 2008

Suggested Citation

Norton, Helen L., Government Workers and Government Speech (October 28, 2008). First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 7, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1291462

Contact Information

Helen L. Norton (Contact Author)
University of Colorado School of Law ( email )
401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 631
Downloads: 83
Download Rank: 176,747
Footnotes:  55

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.312 seconds