Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1291563
 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



Three Models of Constitutional Torts


David T. Zaring


University of Pennsylvania - Legal Studies Department

October 28, 2008

Journal of Tort Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
The new prominence of constitutional tort claims like Valerie Plame's and Jose Padilla's calls for a re-examination of the form, a basic, but often overlooked, kind of lawsuit. This essay divides constitutional tort claims into three different types, each with different purposes and different kinds of plaintiffs, and each with different implications for the regulation of government policy. It also makes the case for the continuing, if uneasy, relevance of the form, despite its often belabored, but certainly justified, reputation for hostility towards plaintiffs.

Constitutional torts do not always fail in every way, or in the same ways. To be sure, there are the pro se and quasi-pro se cases that always lose. But there are also the excessive use of force cases that sometimes do not lose. And, increasingly, there are the policy-related strike suits against senior federal officials where liability, in the end, is not the point. After trifurcating the constitutional tort, the paper seeks to explain why it remains interesting, and draws some larger conclusions about the evolution of the Bivens suit, which increasingly looks like a new, albeit problematic, locus of the old impulse towards institutional reform litigation, and an increasingly-resorted-to alternative to lawsuits under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 29, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Zaring, David T., Three Models of Constitutional Torts (October 28, 2008). Journal of Tort Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1291563

Contact Information

David T. Zaring (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania - Legal Studies Department ( email )
3730 Walnut Street
Suite 600
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6365
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,109
Downloads: 105
Download Rank: 155,958
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds