Idiosyncratic Risk, Costly Arbitrage, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Chinese University of Hong Kong
University of Texas at Austin - McCombs School of Business
July 31, 2010
We test a new cross-sectional relation between expected stock return and idiosyncratic risk implied by the theory of limits to arbitrage. If idiosyncratic risk prevents arbitrageurs from offsetting the choices of irrational inventors and arbitrageurs find it more difficult to correct the mispricing of stocks with high idiosyncratic risk, then there should be a positive relation between expected return and expected idiosyncratic volatility for relatively undervalued stocks, but a negative relation for relatively overvalued stocks. We combine several well-known anomalies to measure a stock's relative mispricing. We confirm that average stock returns monotonically increase (decrease) with idiosyncratic risk for relatively undervalued (overvalued) stocks. Overall, our paper supports limits to arbitrage and idiosyncratic risk as an important arbitrage cost.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: limits to arbitrage, idiosyncratic risk, mispricing
JEL Classification: G12working papers series
Date posted: October 30, 2008 ; Last revised: August 26, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.265 seconds