Deception, Decisions, and Investor Education
Jayne W. Barnard
William & Mary Law School
October 29, 2008
Elder Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2009
Tens of millions of dollars are spent each year to fund educational programs aimed at elderly investors. Many of these programs focus on fraud prevention. In this Article, Professor Barnard questions the effectiveness of these programs. Drawing on recent studies from marketing scholars, neurobiologists, social psychologists, and behavioral economists examining the ways in which older adults process information, she offers a model of decision making (the deception/decision cycle) that explains why older adults are disproportionately vulnerable to investment fraud schemes. She then suggests that many of the factors that contribute to fraud victimization are unlikely to be influenced by fraud prevention education. She suggests some alternative uses for the money now spent on fraud prevention education that would better achieve the goal of protecting investors.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: fraud, cognitive biases, scamming vulnerability, Iowa Gambling Task, deception/decision cycleAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 30, 2008 ; Last revised: May 11, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.407 seconds