Katz and the Origins of the 'Reasonable Expectation of Privacy' Test
Peter A. Winn
University of Washington - School of Law
October 29, 2008
McGeorge Law Review, Forthcoming
The reasonable expectation of privacy test, formulated in the 1967 case of Katz v. United States, represents a great touchstone in the law of privacy. Katz is important not only because the test is used to determine when a governmental intrusion constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment; but also because the test has also found its way into state common law, statutes and even the laws of other nations. The credit for the development of the test belongs to counsel for Charles Katz, Harvey (now Judge) Schneider, who presented the test for the first time in his oral argument, not in his briefs. The majority opinion's curious failure to mention the test is explained by the fact that the law clerk responsible for drafting Justice Stewart's majority opinion missed the oral argument. Given this context, the articulation of the test in Justice Harlan's short concurring opinion is all the more remarkable, establishing him as not only a great jurist, but as a judge who knew how to listen.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: legal history, reasonable expectation of privacy, privacy, search and seizure, Fourth Amendment, John Marshall Harlan, Potter Stewart, Laurence Tribe
JEL Classification: K14, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 8, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.438 seconds