Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1292359
 
 

Footnotes (3)



 


 



Opening Statement: Why President-Elect Obama May Keep His Senate Seat After Assuming the Presidency


Seth Barrett Tillman


National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law

December 1, 2008

University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, Vol. 157, pp. 134, 135-140, 2008

Abstract:     
In a few months, "We the People" will go to the polls and elect the electors who will elect (or, at least, have an opportunity to elect) the next President of the United States. Short of an act of God or an act of war, it is more likely than not that the next President will be a sitting United States Senator. The expectation is that a Senator/President-elect resigns his or her legislative seat some time prior taking the presidential oath of office. It is widely believed in large and influential academic circles and among the educated public generally that the Constitution requires this result by expressly precluding joint simultaneous Legislative-Executive Branch office holding.

I respectfully dissent. I believe the conventional view is mistaken as a matter of the original public meaning of the Constitution. Although the idea of a sitting Senator holding the office of President is somewhat counter-intuitive, this is one example of the dangers of unexamined intuitions. True, the Constitution does preclude joint Legislative Branch-Executive Branch service. But for incompatibility purposes, the President is not part of the Executive Branch; rather, the (elected) President presides over it, as opposed to (appointed) Executive Branch officers -- which are under it. Therefore, a sitting Senator can keep his or her seat while serving as President.

In short, the Incompatibility Clause bars Representatives and Senators from "holding any office under the United States." Here, I argue that the phrase "office under the United States" is a term of art referring to statutory or appointed officers, not to the President. In short, the Incompatibility Clause does not bar joint Senate-Presidential office-holding; it bars Senators from working for the President (or being appointed by the President), it does not bar a Senator from being President.

In addition to Professor Calabresi's response, which was part of the debate on PENNumbra, I had a similar exchange with Professor Prakash. See Seth Barrett Tillman, Why Our Next President May Keep His or Her Senate Seat: A Conjecture on the Constitution's Incompatibility Clause, 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y 107 (2009); 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y Sidebar 1 (2008); Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, Response, Why the Incompatibility Clause Applies to the Office of President, 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y 143 (2009); 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y Sidebar 35 (2008).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: President, Senate, Senator, Incompatibility

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 1, 2008 ; Last revised: August 18, 2010

Suggested Citation

Tillman, Seth Barrett, Opening Statement: Why President-Elect Obama May Keep His Senate Seat After Assuming the Presidency (December 1, 2008). University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, Vol. 157, pp. 134, 135-140, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1292359

Contact Information

Seth Barrett Tillman (Contact Author)
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law ( email )
Ollscoil na hÉireann, Má Nuad
New House (#306)
Maynooth, County Kildare
Ireland
(353) (0) 1474-7216 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.nuim.ie/staff/mr-seth-barrett-tillman
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,654
Downloads: 380
Download Rank: 42,760
Footnotes:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds