Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1292476
 
 

Citations (6)



 


 



After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard


Karl S. Okamoto


Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law

October 30, 2008

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, 2009
Drexel College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-A-15

Abstract:     
How do we make our financial world safer? This Article offers a strategy for regulating financial markets to better prevent the kind of disaster we have seen in recent months. By developing a model of risk manager decision-making, this Article illustrates how even "good people" acting in utterly rational and expected ways brought us into economic turmoil.

The assertion of this Article is that the root cause of the current financial crisis is systemic moral hazard. Systemic moral hazard poses a unique challenge in crafting a regulatory response. The challenge lies in that the best response to systemic moral hazard is "preventive prediction." It is inherently difficult to reward individuals for producing preventive prediction. Therefore markets fail to produce it at optimal levels, and thus prevent systemic moral hazard and the kind of crisis we are facing.

The difficulty in valuing preventive prediction is seen when we model how risk managers make decisions regarding the prevention of excessive risk. The model reveals that the balance is easily tipped in favor of risk-taking that leads to systemic failure and broad social harm. The model also reveals how regulation might work to reset the balance to one that is superior for society. We achieve this by imposing two requirements on all asset managers in the market: we require them to put their own money at risk in their trading decisions, and we require them to use "best practices" in managing risk. These prescriptions arise out of a regulatory strategy that accepts the need to balance the benefits of risk-taking in financial markets (and the consequent inevitability of some financial failure) with the desire to avoid excessive risk-taking and the costs of systemic collapse. It is a strategy that focuses on those instances where we cannot trust ourselves to be prudent.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: Regulation, Financial Markets, Financial Crisis, Bailout

JEL Classification: K22, G28, G18, D81, D62

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Okamoto, Karl S., After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard (October 30, 2008). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, 2009; Drexel College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-A-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1292476

Contact Information

Karl S. Okamoto (Contact Author)
Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law ( email )
3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,217
Downloads: 732
Download Rank: 18,652
Citations:  6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds