SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard

Karl S. Okamoto
Drexel University - Earle Mack School of Law



UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, 2009
Drexel College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-A-15

Abstract:     
How do we make our financial world safer? This Article offers a strategy for regulating financial markets to better prevent the kind of disaster we have seen in recent months. By developing a model of risk manager decision-making, this Article illustrates how even "good people" acting in utterly rational and expected ways brought us into economic turmoil.

The assertion of this Article is that the root cause of the current financial crisis is systemic moral hazard. Systemic moral hazard poses a unique challenge in crafting a regulatory response. The challenge lies in that the best response to systemic moral hazard is "preventive prediction." It is inherently difficult to reward individuals for producing preventive prediction. Therefore markets fail to produce it at optimal levels, and thus prevent systemic moral hazard and the kind of crisis we are facing.

The difficulty in valuing preventive prediction is seen when we model how risk managers make decisions regarding the prevention of excessive risk. The model reveals that the balance is easily tipped in favor of risk-taking that leads to systemic failure and broad social harm. The model also reveals how regulation might work to reset the balance to one that is superior for society. We achieve this by imposing two requirements on all asset managers in the market: we require them to put their own money at risk in their trading decisions, and we require them to use "best practices" in managing risk. These prescriptions arise out of a regulatory strategy that accepts the need to balance the benefits of risk-taking in financial markets (and the consequent inevitability of some financial failure) with the desire to avoid excessive risk-taking and the costs of systemic collapse. It is a strategy that focuses on those instances where we cannot trust ourselves to be prudent.

Keywords: Regulation, Financial Markets, Financial Crisis, Bailout

JEL Classifications: K22, G28, G18, D81, D62

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 01, 2008 ; Last revised: April 15, 2009

Suggested Citation

Okamoto, Karl S., After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard (October 30, 2008). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, 2009; Drexel College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-A-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1292476


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Karl S. Okamoto (Contact Author)
Drexel University - Earle Mack School of Law ( email )
3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,556
Downloads: 407
Download Rank: 18,798
Citations: 1

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.110 seconds.