Abstract

 
 

References (83)



 
 

Citations (20)



 


 



Focusing on Fannie and Freddie: The Dilemmas of Reforming Housing Finance


Lawrence J. White


New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business; Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics

September 2001

NYU Working Paper No. EC-02-01

Abstract:     
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are unique and controversial participants in the housingfinance system of the United States. Because of these enterprises' federal government charters, the financial markets believe that the government would not allow Fannie and Freddie to fail to honor their debt obligations, and they are thereby able to borrow more cheaply in credit markets; in turn, they lower interest rates for residential mortgages. If the financial markets are right, however, Freddie and Fannie also create a contingent liability for the government. Though there are positiveexternalities from home ownership, the Fannie/Freddie route is far too broad and unfocused to address those externalities effectively. Privatization, accompanied by targeted federal assistance for potential first-time low- and moderate-income home buyers, would be a superior policy direction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: housing finance, mortgages, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, government sponsored enterprises

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 31, 2008  

Suggested Citation

White, Lawrence J., Focusing on Fannie and Freddie: The Dilemmas of Reforming Housing Finance (September 2001). NYU Working Paper No. EC-02-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1292647

Contact Information

Lawrence J. White (Contact Author)
New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business ( email )
44 West 4th Street
New York, NY NY 10012
United States
Leonard N. Stern School of Business - Department of Economics ( email )
269 Mercer Street
New York, NY 10003
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 287
Downloads: 50
References:  83
Citations:  20

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.656 seconds