Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1293216
 
 

References (24)



 


 



Schmitt's Critique of Kelsenian Normativism


Sylvie Delacroix


University College London - Faculty of Laws

March 1, 2005

Ratio Juris, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 30-45, March 2005

Abstract:     
The aim of this paper is to underline the relevance of Schmitt's critique of Kelsenian normativism in the context of today's debate about the status of legal positivism. Schmitt's underlining of the limits which a certain kind of positivism imposes upon itself highlights a contemporary issue about what legal theory should aim at when accounting for the normative dimension of law. Schmitt's ultimate failure to take up the theoretical challenge he himself raised (with its well-known consequences) is deemed to illustrate-negatively-the importance of providing a plausible account of the social practices which bring law into existence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Carl Schmitt, Kelsen, normativity, Weimar, decisionism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 2, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Delacroix, Sylvie, Schmitt's Critique of Kelsenian Normativism (March 1, 2005). Ratio Juris, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 30-45, March 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1293216

Contact Information

Sylvie Delacroix (Contact Author)
University College London - Faculty of Laws ( email )
London WC1E OEG
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/academics/profiles/index.shtml?delacroix
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 630
Downloads: 166
Download Rank: 103,539
References:  24

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds