Abstract

 
 

References (80)



 


 



Corruption in Public Procurement Auctions: Positive Equilibrium Analysis, Incentive Mechanism Design, and Empirical Study


Maria Monica Wihardja


Centre of Strategic and International Studies

February 23, 2009


Abstract:     
We provide a positive analysis of the equilibrium bidding and bribing strategies with and without corruption in a first-price, sealed-bid, procurement auction with two-dimensional-type bidders. With corruption, we assume that the quality of the bidders are unobservable and non-contractible ex-post. We show examples of equilibrium bids and bribes of N two-dimensional-type bidders in an incomplete information game where the type space is discrete and strategy space is infinite. The equilibrium bid and bribe decrease in the number of bidders. Moreover, we show that in this auction with corruption, quality is randomly chosen, constraining efficiency. In fact, no mechanism can be efficient in this auction. The empirical study suggests that increasing the number of bidders increases the percentage cost efficiency at a decreasing rate and it starts to decrease the percentage cost efficiency after it reaches a certain number of bidders.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Auction, Procurement, Corruption

JEL Classification: D44, H57, D73

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 4, 2008 ; Last revised: July 16, 2009

Suggested Citation

Wihardja, Maria Monica , Corruption in Public Procurement Auctions: Positive Equilibrium Analysis, Incentive Mechanism Design, and Empirical Study (February 23, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1294088 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1294088

Contact Information

Maria Monica Wihardja (Contact Author)
Centre of Strategic and International Studies ( email )
The Jakarta Post Building, 3-4th Floor
Jl. Palmerah Barat 142-143
Jakarta, 10270
Indonesia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 637
Downloads: 164
Download Rank: 90,296
References:  80

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds