Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1294786
 


 



Evaluation of the Dilution-Parody Paradox in the Wake of the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006


Justin J. Gunnell


Cornell University - Law School

November 3, 2008

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 441, 2008

Abstract:     
Dilution protects famous trademark owners from use of their marks by others that serve to either weaken the mark's capacity to serve as a source identifier or harm the reputation of their mark. Parody, on the other hand, is a protected form of expression under the First Amendment that allows an artist to poke fun at recognizable aspects of society. Trademarks are often the butt of detrimental attempts at parody. In the past, a substantial percentage of dilution cases have been attempts by mark holders to enjoin harmful commercial uses of their famous brands - even if such a use could loosely be construed as a "parody." Yet, the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (the "TDRA") has carved out a broad and explicit exception for parody, one that is seemingly stronger than any protection that parodies previously enjoyed in the dilution context. It seems under the language of the TDRA, once a potentially infringing use is termed a "parody," and regardless of the degree in which it seriously harms a famous mark, the parodist has a higher probability of escaping strict judicial scrutiny than ever before. Such a result raises important questions as to the current state of dilution law.

This article explores the implications of the parody protection outlined in the TDRA and how courts may interpret it while still retaining significant judicial scrutiny over harmful or improper trademark parodies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: dilution, parody, trademark, trademarks, parodies, TDRA, Trademark Dilution Recvision Act

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 5, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Gunnell, Justin J., Evaluation of the Dilution-Parody Paradox in the Wake of the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (November 3, 2008). Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 441, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1294786

Contact Information

Justin J. Gunnell (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 929
Downloads: 170
Download Rank: 102,628
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds