|
||||
|
||||
Business School Research: Some Preliminary SuggestionsR. Edward FreemanUniversity of Virginia - Darden School of Business David NewkirkUniversity of Virginia - Darden School of Business 1st IESE Conference, "Humanizing the Firm & Management Profession", Barcelona, IESE Business School, June 30-July 2, 2008 Abstract: Recent critiques of business schools have led to the formulation of three interconnected problems: the problem of research; the problem of the use of knowledge; and, the normative problem. At the heart of the issue is what we have called the separation thesis or the separation fallacy, most powerfully seen as the exclusion of ethics from business judgments, but generalizable to a duality between the worlds of management and humanity. If we give up this fallacy, we can gain a different and more pluralist view of the role of research in business school, and as the nature of meaningful research. We lay out five main modes of research, and suggest how each can escape the separation fallacy. We then show how the problem of the use of knowledge can be ameliorated by giving up the separation fallacy. Finally, we suggest how we can re-define and re-discover the disciplines of business by thinking about more thick moral conceptions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Keywords: Business Ethics, Ethics, Stakeholder Theory, Stakeholder Management, Research, Modes of Research, Role of Research in the Business School, Separation Thesis, Separation Fallacy, Management Science working papers seriesDate posted: November 5, 2008 ; Last revised: December 1, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.594 seconds