|
||||
|
||||
California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards
Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School James H. A. Pooley affiliation not provided to SSRN November 4, 2008 Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1295606 Abstract: In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed the state's strong policy against noncompetition agreements, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's "narrow restraint" exception. We explain what the Court did, why California's policy makes sense, and what the opinion will mean for employers, for the high-tech industry, and for trade secret law. Working Paper Series Date posted: November 05, 2008 ; Last revised: February 06, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.219 seconds.