Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1297523
 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



Preventive Detention in the War on Terror: A Comparison of How the United States, Britain, and Israel Detain and Incapacitate Terrorist Suspects


Stephanie Cooper Blum


Department of Homeland Security ; Michigan State University

November 7, 2008

Homeland Security Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 3, October 2008

Abstract:     
After September 11, 2001, the Administration decided to detain individuals suspected of being members or agents of al Qaeda or the Taliban as enemy combatants and hold them indefinitely for the duration of the war on terror. The rationale behind this system of preventive detention is to incapacitate suspected terrorists and facilitate interrogation. While the need for preventive detention is legitimate, the Administration asserts that its decision-making process to label individuals as enemy combatants should exclusively reside within the executive branch, thereby bypassing the checks and balances that comprise America's democratic system. Israel and Britain have been dealing with terrorism for decades, and both countries have shown that democracies facing comparable terrorist threats can implement preventive detention policies that are not based on unilateral executive usurpation of power. This article explores whether any insights can be gleaned from Israel's and Britain's forms of preventive detention in order to make a recommendation to the next Administration.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 9, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Blum, Stephanie Cooper, Preventive Detention in the War on Terror: A Comparison of How the United States, Britain, and Israel Detain and Incapacitate Terrorist Suspects (November 7, 2008). Homeland Security Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 3, October 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1297523

Contact Information

Stephanie Cooper Blum (Contact Author)
Department of Homeland Security ( email )
United States
Michigan State University
Agriculture Hall
East Lansing, MI 48824-1122
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 741
Downloads: 178
Download Rank: 97,864
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds