Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1297588
 
 

References (52)



 
 

Citations (5)



 


 



Intuitive Lawmaking: The Example of Child Support


Ira Mark Ellman


Arizona State University College of Law; Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

Sanford L. Braver


Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

Robert MacCoun


Stanford Law School

November 7, 2008

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2009

Abstract:     
Setting the amount of a child support award involves tradeoffs in the allocation of finite resources among at least three private parties: the two parents, and their child or children. Federal law today requires states to have child support guidelines or formulas that determine child support amounts on a uniform statewide basis. These state guidelines differ in how they make these unavoidable tradeoffs. In choosing the correct balance of these competing claims, policymakers would do well to understand the public's intuitions about the appropriate tradeoffs. We report an empirical study of lay intuitions about these tradeoffs, and compare those intuitions to the principles underlying typical state guidelines. As in other contexts in which people are asked to place a dollar value on a legal claim, we find that citizen assessments of child support for particular cases conform to the pattern that Ariely and his coauthors have called "coherent arbitrariness": The respondent's choice of dollar magnitude may be arbitrary, but relative values respond coherently to case variations, within and across citizens. These patterns suggest that our respondents have a consistent and systematic preference with respect to the structure of child support formulas that differs in important ways from either of the two systems adopted by nearly all states.

Please note: this accepted paper differs substantially from the working paper of the same name previously posted on SSRN.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: child support, tradeoffs, incommensurability, coherent arbitrariness, lawmaking

JEL Classification: D63, J12, K10, K39

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 10, 2008 ; Last revised: November 17, 2008

Suggested Citation

Ellman, Ira Mark and Braver, Sanford L. and MacCoun, Robert, Intuitive Lawmaking: The Example of Child Support (November 7, 2008). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1297588

Contact Information

Ira Mark Ellman (Contact Author)
Arizona State University College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
480-965-2125 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.asu.edu/HomePages/Ellman/
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Sanford L. Braver
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Robert MacCoun
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 836
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 68,420
References:  52
Citations:  5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds