Pre-Hearing Techniques to Promote Speed and Cost-Effectiveness-Some Thoughts Concerning Arbitral Process Design

Jack J. Coe Jr.

Pepperdine University

November 11, 2008

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, Vol. 2, 2002

This essay considers factors and pre-hearing techniques that bear on international arbitration hearings by attempting to answer this question: "What can be done to promote speed and efficiency in the hearing process?" First, it offers general observations, including the goals and by-products of efficiency, issues related to defining terms and frames of reference, the flexibility of arbitration practice techniques, and the role of technology in arbitration proceedings. Then, it discusses specific factors that influence the expeditiousness of arbitration, especially the arbitration clause and its use to define critical elements of the proceedings, such as situs, number of arbitrators, and time restrictions. The article then discusses the effect of oral vs. written submissions (simultaneous or otherwise) and the issuance of post-hearing briefs on the efficiency of the proceedings. This is followed by discussions of the benefits of pre-hearing conferences, issues related to stipulations and presumptions that narrow the scope of the controversy, and the handling of documents, including core collections, agreed bundles, and other documentary consolidations. Next, the article discusses the advantages of adjudicative and collaborative narrowing of the controversy, including bifurcation and summary judgment. The final section briefly discusses the advocate's mantra-hope for the best and prepare for the worst. The article concludes with a bibliography of related sources.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: hearing, pre-hearing, arbitration, international arbitration, arbitration hearing, speed, efficiency, process, arbitration practice, arbitrator

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: November 12, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Coe, Jack J., Pre-Hearing Techniques to Promote Speed and Cost-Effectiveness-Some Thoughts Concerning Arbitral Process Design (November 11, 2008). Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, Vol. 2, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1299870

Contact Information

Jack J. Coe Jr. (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 396
Downloads: 74
Download Rank: 183,225

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.625 seconds