Stalking the Jets and the Sharks: Exploring the Constitutionality of the Gang Death Penalty Enhancer
Harry M. Caldwell
Pepperdine University - School of Law
Abraham Lincoln University School of Law
November 12, 2008
George Mason Law Review, Vol. 12, 2004
This article considers the constitutionality of the recent effort to expand death penalty qualifying circumstances, specifically "gang-related murder." Currently, four states include gang-related murder in their death penalty schemes. This articles questions whether this qualifier meets the narrowing standard set by the Supreme Court in Furman v. Georgia for death penalty schemes. Furman requires that there be an identifiable and rational means of distinguishing who is to be capitally charged from those who are capitally eligible. As gang-related crimes are a harsh reality in America, the gang-related qualifier may cede too much discretion to state prosecutors because of the high percentage of gang-related murders compared to all murders. The gang-related qualifier may further raise constitutional issues of whether "gang-related" is specific enough to instill confidence that the notice requirements demanded by the Due Process Clause are met. Finally, the gang-related qualifier may run afoul of Furman's narrowing requirement as it is the first death qualifier that singles out membership or association in a particular type of organization. As gang membership may well begin with a presumption favoring death charges, the mere fact of association would place gang members in a particularly vulnerable position - a position contrary to Furman.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: Constitution, death penalty, capital punishment, Furman, gang, gang member, gang-related murder, murder, homicide, capital, capital offense, crime, capital crime, due process, death qualifierAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 16, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds