Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1300682
 
 

Footnotes (134)



 


 



The Adequacy of Reasoning in the Arbitral Tribunal's Decision in Saluka Investments v. Czech Republic


George S. Georgiev


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

January 31, 2008


Abstract:     
A version of this paper was published in "The Reasons Requirement in International Investment Arbitration: Critical Case Studies" (Guillermo Aguilar Alvarez & W. Michael Reisman eds., 2008).

This paper was written as part of a project that analyzed recent international investment arbitration decisions with respect to the quality and adequacy of the reasoning provided by the tribunal and its compliance with the reasons requirements contained in the applicable legal framework (e.g., Article 48(3) of the ICSID Convention, Article 47(1)(i) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules, Article 52(2)(i) of the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, Article 32(3) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, customary international law, etc.). In line with the goals of the project, the paper focuses primarily on the grounds which the tribunal in Saluka v. Czech Republic provided in support of its legal conclusions, without necessarily analyzing the merits of these conclusions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: international investment arbitration, ICSID Convention, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, fair and equitable treatment standard

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 16, 2008 ; Last revised: November 20, 2008

Suggested Citation

Georgiev, George S., The Adequacy of Reasoning in the Arbitral Tribunal's Decision in Saluka Investments v. Czech Republic (January 31, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1300682 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1300682

Contact Information

George Georgiev (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )
405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 734
Downloads: 276
Download Rank: 62,503
Footnotes:  134

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.218 seconds