|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
The Draft Common Frame of Reference, Methodological Nationalism and the Way ForwardJan M. SmitsMaastricht University Faculty of Law - Maastricht European Private Law Institute (M-EPLI); University of Helsinki - Center of Excellence in Foundations of European Law and Polity November 1, 2008 European Review of Contract Law, Vol. 4, pp. 270-280, 2009 Abstract: The Draft Common Frame of Reference for a European Private Law (DCFR) suffers from so-called methodological nationalism: the DCFR adopts a view of law and lawmaking developed for national jurisdictions and in doing so, it takes too little into account that what is best at the national level may not be optimal at the European one. The argument is made by reference to three different features of the DCFR: the idea of comprehensive codification, the choice of the relevant rules and the way in which law is represented. It is then argued that the DCFR should be presented in a differentiated way, dependent on whether its function is to create binding rules, offer a source of inspiration for legal scholarship and teaching or to take the first step towards the creation of an optional contract code.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11 Keywords: Common Frame of Reference, DCFR, European Private Law, Methodological Nationalism working papers seriesDate posted: November 17, 2008 ; Last revised: January 20, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.813 seconds
