Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1302925
 
 

Footnotes (186)



 


 



A Comparative Critique of the Practice of Irish Neutrality in the 'Unneutral' Discourse


Karen Devine


Dublin City University

November 17, 2008


Abstract:     
This article takes a comparative, empirical look at the practice of Irish neutrality during the World War II. It critiques a model of neutrality presented in a thesis on Irish neutrality called Unneutral Ireland, consisting of factors derived from an analysis of three states regarded as well-established European neutrals, Austria, Sweden and Switzerland that reflect the practice of neutrality. That model focused on the rights and duties of neutrality; the recognition of Ireland's status by belligerents and others; the disavowal of external help; and the freedom of decision and action. This present article focuses on the factors flowing from these latter obligations that are cited in an analysis of the practice of Irish neutrality, in the Unneutral thesis as proof of Ireland's 'unneutral' status, i.e. ideology; involvement in economic sanctions; partiality; the practice of Irish citizens joining the British army; and post-World War II factors such as Ireland's EEC membership. In this article, Ireland's practice of neutrality is evaluated against the practice of other European neutral states - Sweden, Switzerland, Austria and Finland (including Norway's truncated practice of neutrality) - vis-a-vis the above variables. This article also deals with the perennial myths that crop up in 'unneutral' discourses on Irish neutrality, for example, the oft-cited incidence of de Valera's alleged visit to the German legation in Ireland to sign a book of condolences on Hitler's death and the suggestions of a British government offer of a deal on Northern Ireland in exchange for Ireland dropping its neutral stance and supporting the Allies in World War II. The article concludes that the practice of Irish neutrality is equivalent to or superior to the practice of other European neutral states, thus undermining the dominant discourse that Ireland's neutrality is a myth and that Ireland is 'unneutral'.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Neutrality, Ireland, discourse, World War II

JEL Classification: N44

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Devine, Karen, A Comparative Critique of the Practice of Irish Neutrality in the 'Unneutral' Discourse (November 17, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1302925 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1302925

Contact Information

Karen Devine (Contact Author)
Dublin City University ( email )
Ireland
HOME PAGE: http://www.dcu.ie/info/staff_member.php?id_no=3187
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 586
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 234,606
Footnotes:  186

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds