Footnotes (22)



Beetles, Frogs, and Lawyers: The Scientific Demarcation Problem in the Gilson Theory of Value Creation

Jeffrey M. Lipshaw

Suffolk University Law School

December 10, 2008

Willamette Law Review, Forthcoming
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 08-38

Recently, Ronald Gilson described a transactional lawyer turned law professor as someone who was a beetle, but became an entomologist. This is not the first non-mammalian metaphor used by an economically inclined legal academic to demarcate those who study and those who are studied. As Richard Posner so colorfully explained rational actors as they appear to economists studying them objectively: "it would not be a solecism to speak of a rational frog." In this short essay, I suggest that both say something about the prevailing view of theorizing that is entitled to privileged epistemic status in the legal academy. Some economic explanations of the activities of beetles, frogs, and lawyers are entitled to this status, and some are not. I assess Professor Gilson's classic 1984 article on value creation by lawyers in terms of its implicit claims to (social) scientific knowledge, and conclude that it is not.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: transaction cost engineers, rational actor, law and economics, Gilson, philosophy of science, falsification, Popper, demarcation

JEL Classification: B21, K40

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 18, 2008 ; Last revised: August 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Lipshaw, Jeffrey M., Beetles, Frogs, and Lawyers: The Scientific Demarcation Problem in the Gilson Theory of Value Creation (December 10, 2008). Willamette Law Review, Forthcoming; Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 08-38. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1303483 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1303483

Contact Information

Jeffrey M. Lipshaw (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
HOME PAGE: http://ssrn.com/author=381790

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,847
Downloads: 176
Download Rank: 128,284
Footnotes:  22

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds