Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304952
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (51)



 


 



Honor's Constitutional Moment: The Oath and Presidential Transitions


Paul Horwitz


University of Alabama School of Law

November 21, 2008

Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming
U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1304952

Abstract:     
This Essay is part of a virtual symposium on the law of presidential transitions which will run in the coming weeks in Colloquy, the online supplement of the Northwestern University Law Review. This contribution to the symposium focuses on the implications of the Presidential Oath Clause.

Drawing on Bruce Ackerman's language, the Essay argues that every presidential transition is, in an important sense, a constitutional moment. That moment is instantiated in a single act - the taking of the presidential oath. The oath is both an official act and a deeply personal one, in which the oath-taker stakes his honor on the preservation, protection, and defense of the Constitution. In doing so, the new President necessarily must come to his own understanding of what the Constitution means and what obligations it imposes on him. The President's duty to consider what the Constitution means, and thus what his oath requires of him, is indefeasible: he cannot simply defer to the constitutional views of the courts, of Congress, of prior presidents, or even of the people who elected him.

This understanding of the presidential oath as constitutional moment carries with it a host of possible implications. They involve competing understandings of the nature of executive power, of whether the President is obliged to preserve only the Constitution or the nation itself, and of whether the new President is obligated to revisit and either ratify or rescind - or even prosecute - every action taken by the prior administration. In confronting these questions, the new President will also consider competing informational influences and policy considerations that may weigh on his choices. Ultimately, however, the Presidential Oath Clause makes clear that the new President is oath-bound to independently consider what the Constitution means and what it requires of him, and to act accordingly.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Presidential Oath Clause, presidential transitions, legal transitions, oaths, Barack Obama

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 21, 2008 ; Last revised: November 30, 2008

Suggested Citation

Horwitz, Paul, Honor's Constitutional Moment: The Oath and Presidential Transitions (November 21, 2008). Northwestern University Law Review, Forthcoming; U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1304952. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1304952

Contact Information

Paul Horwitz (Contact Author)
University of Alabama School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 974
Downloads: 78
Download Rank: 183,622
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  51

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.235 seconds