Getting the Roberts Court Right: A Response to Chemerinsky
Jonathan H. Adler
Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
Wayne Law Review, Vol. 54, p. 983, 2008
Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-32
In The Roberts Court at Age Three, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky offers a preliminary assessment of the Roberts Court. Among other things, Dean Chemerinsky reviews the effect of the Court's shrunken docket and the role of Justice Anthony Kennedy as the Court's median justice. Reviewing the Court's decisions over the past three years, Dean Chemerinsky concludes that the Roberts Court is the the most conservative Court since the mid-1930s. This is a substantial overstatement. The Roberts Court appears moderately more conservative than its predecessors in some contexts, but is also quite liberal in others. Its decisions on enemy combatants, capital punishment, and standing, among other issues, could hardly be characterized as conservative, however this term is defined. Furthermore, any assessment of the Roberts Court at this point is necessarily tentative. The current roster of justices have sat together for less than three full terms, and the small size of the docket means any single term provides an unrepresentative picture of the Court's jurisprudence. While the Roberts Court may eventually show itself to be a conservative court, there is no basis at present to claim the Court is the most conservative in over seventy years.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: Chief Justice John Roberts, Erwin Chemerinsky
JEL Classification: K40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 26, 2008 ; Last revised: April 13, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.625 seconds