Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1307189
 
 

Footnotes (376)



 


 



Elements of Liberty


Deana Pollard-Sacks


Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law

November 2008

Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008

Abstract:     
Liberty analysis under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been enormously inconsistent throughout the history of constitutional jurisprudence. In construing the meaning of "liberty," the Supreme Court has utilized a variety of interpretive methods but has never settled on any one in particular. Liberty jurisprudence is thus unpredictable, because the Court chooses among its various methods on a case-by-case basis. This is not desirable, because it encourages biased and personal value-based decision-making. There is a better solution. The Court's various interpretive methods over the past century reveal certain recurring objective analytical elements, although these elements are not always used, and have never been articulated together in a unified liberty test. These elements should be synthesized into one multi-dimensional interpretive test to further neutral and enduring liberty jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 26, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Pollard-Sacks, Deana, Elements of Liberty (November 2008). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1307189

Contact Information

Deana Pollard-Sacks (Contact Author)
Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law ( email )
3100 Cleburne Street
Houston, TX 77004
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 423
Downloads: 57
Download Rank: 219,481
Footnotes:  376

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds