| |
Abstract
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1307263
|
|
|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1548428. ; Size: 674K
|
|
Lessons From an Oops at Consumer Reports®: Consumers Follow Experts; Ignore Invalid Information
Uri Simonsohn University of Pennsylvania - The Wharton School
January 25, 2010
Abstract:
In 2007 Consumer Reports released, and two weeks later retracted, a flawed report on the safety of infant carseats. Analyzing data from 5,471 online auctions for carseats ending before, during and after the information was considered valid I find that (1) consumers responded to the new information, and –more interestingly- that (2) they promptly ceased to do so once it was retracted. This first finding, thanks to the random nature of the flawed ratings, demonstrates that expert advice has a causal effect on consumer demand. The second finding suggests that people’s inability to willfully ignore information is not as extreme as the experimental evidence in the psychological literature would suggest.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: Behavioral Economics, maketplace, consumer behavior, heuristics and biases, hindsight bias, curse of knowledge
Open PDF in Browser
Download This Paper
Date posted: November 26, 2008
; Last revised: May 8, 2012
|
| Feedback to SSRN |
|
|
|
|
|
|