The Conditional Nature of the Value of Corporate Governance
Jianxin Daniel Chi
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) - Department of Finance
D. Scott Lee
University of Nevada, Las Vegas - Lee Business School
July 27, 2009
Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 350-361, February 2010
Agency theory suggests that governance matters more among firms with greater potential agency costs. Rational investors are unlikely to value safeguards against unlikely events. Yet, few studies of the relation between governance and firm value control for investor perceptions of the likelihood of agency conflicts. Shleifer and Vishny (1997) identify investment-related agency conflicts as the more severe type of agency conflicts in the U.S. We measure the perceived likelihood of this type of agency conflict using free cash flow (Jensen, 1986). We find that firm value is an increasing function of improved governance quality among firms with high free cash flow. In contrast, governance benefits are lower or insignificant among firms with low free cash flow. We show that not controlling for this conditional relation between governance and firm value could lead to erroneous conclusions that governance and firm value are unrelated.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: governance, agency, overinvestment, free cash flow, conditional
JEL Classification: C23, G34
Date posted: November 28, 2008 ; Last revised: July 27, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds