Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (37)



 


 



Why Would States Want to Join the ICC? A Theoretical Exploration Based on the Legal Nature of Complementarity


Frederic Megret


McGill University - Faculty of Law


COMPLEMENTARY VIEWS ON COMPLEMENTARITY, Jann Kleffner, Gerben Kor, eds., T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005

Abstract:     
This chapter seeks to explain why states that are at significant risk of having their nationals commit crimes within the ICC's jurisdiction might nonetheless join the Court. It seeks to craft a theory of joining the ICC as being in the national interest of those states, by focusing on complementarity. Joining the ICC can be seen as part of a process of constitutionalization of certain norms, and the international anchoring of an inter-temporal commitment. The article draws on Jon Elster's paradoxes of rationality, and particularly the reinterpretation of the mythology of Ulysses and the sirens.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: international law, international criminal law, international criminal court, constitutionalization, ulysses

JEL Classification: K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Megret, Frederic, Why Would States Want to Join the ICC? A Theoretical Exploration Based on the Legal Nature of Complementarity. COMPLEMENTARY VIEWS ON COMPLEMENTARITY, Jann Kleffner, Gerben Kor, eds., T.M.C. Asser Press, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1308612

Contact Information

Frédéric Mégret (Contact Author)
McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 734
Downloads: 180
Download Rank: 82,850
Footnotes:  37

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds