Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310726
 
 

Footnotes (162)



 


 



The Never-Ending Seizure Order: How Courts Have Granted Immortality to Congress's Mayfly


Steven N. Baker


affiliation not provided to SSRN

November 1, 2008

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008

Abstract:     
When Congress passed the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984, it created a new means of combating counterfeiting: the ex parte seizure order. Armed with such an order, trademark owners can seize counterfeit merchandise without giving advanced notice. Congress, aware that such a process could lead to abuse, created several express limitations to the seizure process. One such limitation was that seizure orders shall not last longer than seven days. Courts, however, are extending the life of seizure orders; some extensions last only days, others months, and still others go on for years. Under what authority have the courts so extended seizure orders, thereby thwarting what appears to be Congress's clear intent that seizure orders under the Act last no longer than seven days? This Article details the problem that led to the Act's passage, Congress's goals embodied within the Act and its legislative history, the way courts have treated the Act and its newly minted seizure process, and the possible reasons why courts have found it within their power to extend seizure orders. Chief among these reasons is the breakdown of the adversarial process in counterfeiting suits, which often proceed only as Trademark Owner v. Various John Does.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: trademark, seizures, seizure orders, ex parte, ex parte seizures, ex parte seizure orders, Lanham Act, Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984, counterfeit

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 3, 2008 ; Last revised: February 20, 2009

Suggested Citation

Baker, Steven N., The Never-Ending Seizure Order: How Courts Have Granted Immortality to Congress's Mayfly (November 1, 2008). Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310726

Contact Information

Steven N. Baker (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 669
Downloads: 73
Download Rank: 198,578
Footnotes:  162

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds