Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310792
 
 

Footnotes (219)



 


 



A Call for the End of the Doctrine of Realignment


Jacob S. Sherkow


Stanford Law School

December 3, 2008

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, No. 3, p. 525, 2008

Abstract:     
In Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 1941, the Supreme Court established the doctrine of realignment, requiring federal courts to examine the issues in dispute and realign each party as plaintiff or defendant if necessary. Due to the complete diversity requirement, realignment gave the federal courts the ability to both create and destroy diversity jurisdiction. Since 1941, the federal courts have struggled to interpret the central holding in Indianapolis, and have created several competing "tests" for realignment. This confusion has made the doctrine of realignment unworkable. Realignment-along with each of the present tests-encourages jurisdictional abuses by forcing the federal courts to examine the merits of jurisdictionally questionable cases. The doctrine also discourages party joinder because parties fear jurisdictionally altering realignment. Rather than focusing on the language of Indianapolis and the current realignment tests, courts wary of improperly aligned pleadings should make use of newer jurisdictional statutes enacted after Indianapolis. In light of realignment's infirmity and the availability of newer, effective legislation, the federal courts should wholly abandon the doctrine of realignment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: jurisdiction, diversity, realignment, federal courts, civil procedure, alignment, party alignment, joinder, indianapolis, chase national bank

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K19, K4, K40, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 3, 2008 ; Last revised: November 10, 2011

Suggested Citation

Sherkow, Jacob S., A Call for the End of the Doctrine of Realignment (December 3, 2008). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, No. 3, p. 525, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310792

Contact Information

Jacob S. Sherkow (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 468
Downloads: 56
Download Rank: 217,869
Footnotes:  219

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds