Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310869
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (130)



 


 



Recidivism as Omission: A Relational Account


Youngjae Lee


Fordham University School of Law

March 10, 2009

Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, 2009
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1310869

Abstract:     
Are repeat offenders more culpable than first-time offenders? In the United States, the most important determinant of punishment for a crime, other than the seriousness of the crime itself, is the offender's criminal history. Despite the popularity of the view that repeat offenders deserve to be treated more harshly than first-time offenders, there is no satisfactory retributivist account of the "recidivist premium." This Article advances a retributivist defense of the recidivist premium and proposes that the recidivist premium be thought of as punishment not, as sometimes suggested, for a defiant attitude or a bad character trait, but as punishment for an omission. The culpable omission that justifies the recidivist premium is, this Article argues, the repeat offender's failure, after his conviction, to arrange his life in a way that ensures a life free of further criminality. This Article argues that, although how individuals conduct their lives as a general matter is not properly the business of the state, once offenders are convicted of a crime, they enter into a thick relationship with the state and that this relationship gives rise to an obligation for the offenders to rearrange their lives in order to steer clear of criminal wrongdoing. This theory, "Recidivism as Omission," offers a firm theoretical foundation to justify the recidivist premium because it does not rely on unwarranted inferences from repeat offenders' criminal histories that they are "bad people" or that they are "defiant of authority." Rather, this account focuses on the significance of conviction and punishment themselves and the ways in which they alter an offender's relationship to the state. In addition, this Article argues that obligations between the state and offenders run in both directions and that we should recognize the ways in which the state may be a responsible actor that should share the blame for recidivists' reoffending.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: recidivism, repeat offender, habitual offender, criminal history, prior conviction, sentencing

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 4, 2008 ; Last revised: March 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Lee, Youngjae, Recidivism as Omission: A Relational Account (March 10, 2009). Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, 2009; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1310869. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1310869

Contact Information

Youngjae Lee (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-7662 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 728
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 132,776
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  130

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds