Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1313211
 
 

References (26)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Legitimate International Institutions: A Neorepublican Perspective


Philip N. Pettit


Princeton University - Department of Politics

December 8, 2008

THE PHILOSOPHY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, John Tasioulas and Samantha Besson, eds., Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
Princeton Law and Public Affairs Working Paper No. 08-012

Abstract:     
Neorepublican theory requires the legitimate domestic state to protect people against domination by others in a way that is not dominating itself: state coercion is to be conducted under the pressure of citizens and their representatives on terms that citizens equally accept. The international order serves a similar protective role in relation to states themselves, and indirectly their members. So what is going to be required for its legitimacy? The chapter outlines a neorepublican response, focusing on how to resolve two distinctive problems. One is the membership problem as to which entities are to play the role played by citizens in the domestic context; the answer given is, legitimate domestic states or states that can be made legitimate. The other is the imbalance problem as to how such states can be equally empowered in the control of the international order; there is no easy answer but neither are there grounds for despair.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 9, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Pettit, Philip N., Legitimate International Institutions: A Neorepublican Perspective (December 8, 2008). THE PHILOSOPHY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, John Tasioulas and Samantha Besson, eds., Oxford University Press, Forthcoming; Princeton Law and Public Affairs Working Paper No. 08-012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1313211

Contact Information

Philip N. Pettit (Contact Author)
Princeton University - Department of Politics ( email )
Corwin Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544-1012
United States
609-258-4759 (Phone)
609-258-1110 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 812
Downloads: 242
Download Rank: 69,204
References:  26
Citations:  3

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.641 seconds