|
||||
|
||||
Deadly Dilemmas II: Bail and Crime
Ronald J. Allen Northwestern University Law School Larry Laudan Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas, UNAM; University of Texas School of Law December 9, 2008 Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 08-44 Abstract: This paper examines the costs and benefits associated with current bail-granting policies and concludes that the granting of bail awaiting trial to those accused of serious crimes of violence and who have a record of prior convictions is unacceptably dangerous, accounting, among other things, for one in every ten homicides. We propose an overhaul of existing bail practices so that those accused of a violent crime have a claim on bail just in case they have two or fewer prior felony convictions. We claim that such a policy would respect both the rights of innocent defendants not to have their liberty curtailed without powerful reasons for doing so and the rights of innocent citizens not to be exposed to an unacceptably high risk of victimization by accused felons on bail. We flatly deny that pretrial liberty for those accused of a violent crime is an absolute right and refute the claim that behavior on bail is wholly unpredictable.
Keywords: bail, preventive detention, prior convictions, violent crimes, serial felons Working Paper SeriesDate posted: December 14, 2008 ; Last revised: January 12, 2009Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.125 seconds.