Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1314825
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Back to the Future: Intellectual Property and the Rediscovery of Property Rights - and Wrongs


June Carbone


University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law

2002

St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 46, 2002

Abstract:     
Not too long ago Property Law was in danger of becoming a dinosaur. What has brought Property back from the brink of first year extinction is the continuing importance of "the thingness of it." The classic account of Property's distinctiveness is that the legal relationships between people are mediated by their relationship to a thing. When the "thing" is important, or the allocation of rights uncertain, Property becomes the stuff of struggle, philosophy and the first year introduction to law. When the allocation of rights becomes so settled that the course focus shifts too completely to the mindnumbing welter of real estate transactions and land use regulations, property as a unified and distinctive concept loses its way.

At the present time the allocation of property rights and the creation of a structure for governance is again engaging the legal imagination. The first year course accordingly examines the question "what is property" in greater depth and considers how the allocation of property rights governs new technologies and the relationships between those involved.

This essay examines these materials, and explain how they frame the way we teach the rest of course. It emphasizes, first, how we use Johnson v. M'Intosh, the Native American land rights case that now opens many property texts, to introduce the idea that property regimes are legal constructs, chosen rather than ordained within particular contexts. Second, it examines the messages that come out of the wild animal cases and compares them to the similar conclusions that come from INS v. AP. and the intellectual property challenges involving Bette Midler and Vanna White. Third, it discusses Moore and Hecht, and the contrasting ideas of property and contract. It ends with the frozen embryos cases and Shack, and the continuing tensions between public policy and the allocation of private interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Property Law, Property Rights, Governance, Land Use, Teaching, Contract, Property, Public Policy, Private Interests, Allocation

JEL Classification: K10, K11, K12

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Carbone, June, Back to the Future: Intellectual Property and the Rediscovery of Property Rights - and Wrongs (2002). St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 46, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1314825

Contact Information

June Carbone (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )
229-19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 561
Downloads: 44
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds