Footnotes (232)



Not All Carried Interests are Created Equal

Adam H. Rosenzweig

Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

December 12, 2008

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2009
Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 08-12-02

Recently, a significant debate over the taxation of so-called “carried interest” in private equity funds has received much attention from scholars, the government, commentators, and the media. This debate has focused on whether private equity fund managers who earn a percentage of the returns generated by the fund should be entitled to preferential “capital gain” treatment on such returns. The primary concern in this debate revolves around whether managers are effectively being compensated for services normally taxed at higher rates while receiving the benefit of preferential rates reserved for capital gains. Proponents of reform point to the services being performed by the managers, while proponents of the current system point to the investment exposure to the underlying assets of the fund. In reality, however, both sides are partially correct: carried interest is “blended” in that it represents both a return to services and a return on capital. Since carried interest is blended in this manner, an analogy to either proves less than satisfying.

The issue of blended labor/investment returns is not new to the tax laws, however. Historically, one way the law has attempted to address the issue was not by deconstructing such returns into constituent parts, but instead by imposing a “holding period” requirement. Under this approach, not all capital investments are created equal; rather, only capital investments held for an arbitrary period of time while bearing the risk of loss qualify for preferential rates. The current debate over the taxation of carried interest in private equity has failed to incorporate this element into the analysis, i.e., the role that holding period plays in denying preferential rates to blended labor/investment returns, such as carried interest. This Article will do so, concluding that, to the extent any reform of the taxation of carried interest within the existing framework of the income tax is appropriate, a better approach may be through the application of the holding period rules rather than through current proposals to either change the definition of capital gains or further complicate the partnership tax rules.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: taxation, carried interest, holding period

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 12, 2008 ; Last revised: September 30, 2009

Suggested Citation

Rosenzweig, Adam H., Not All Carried Interests are Created Equal (December 12, 2008). Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2009; Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 08-12-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1315004

Contact Information

Adam H. Rosenzweig (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,092
Downloads: 223
Download Rank: 102,381
Footnotes:  232

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds