|
||||
|
||||
How Opportunity Costs Decrease the Probability of War in an Incomplete Information GameSolomon W. PolachekState University of New York at Binghamton; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Jun XiangUniversity of Rochester IZA Discussion Paper No. 3883 Abstract: This paper shows that the opportunity costs resulting from economic interdependence decrease the equilibrium probability of war in an incomplete information game. This result is strongly consistent with existing empirical analyses of the inverse trade-conflict relationship, but is the opposite of the conclusion reached by Gartzke et al. (2001), who reject the opportunity cost argument in a game-theoretic framework. As a result of this paper's findings, one cannot dismiss the opportunity cost argument as the explanation why trading nations fight less. Instead this study reaffirms the central position of opportunity costs as the basis for the inverse trade-conflict relationship, thus implying that one need not rely on signaling.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19 Keywords: war, conflict, trade, trade-conflict relationship, interdependence, incomplete information game, signaling JEL Classification: F10, C7, P16 working papers seriesDate posted: December 15, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.501 seconds