Citations (1)


Footnotes (383)



This is Your Products Liability Restatement on Drugs

Lars Noah

University of Florida - Levin College of Law

December 15, 2008

Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 74, 2009

This paper attempts to offer a comprehensive evaluation of the various facets of the Products Liability Restatement that relate to medical technologies, and it does so from a perspective rooted in the regulatory as opposed to the doctrinal challenges posed by these products. The special provisions applicable to prescription drugs and devices have provoked a great deal of scholarly commentary, and the few courts to consider the issue have uncritically relied upon the published critiques. I find little merit in most of these negative assessments, though I point out some flaws in section 6 of new Restatement that seemingly no one else has identified. Part II addresses production defects, focusing on the heated debate over what standards to use in deciding whether a prescription drug suffers from a defective design. Part III considers defects related to the information that accompanies prescription drugs, especially those advertised directly to consumers. Finally, Part IV touches on some of the peculiar issues raised by investigational products, generic drugs, prescription medical devices, and the duties of non-manufacturing sellers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 88

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2009 ; Last revised: September 21, 2015

Suggested Citation

Noah, Lars, This is Your Products Liability Restatement on Drugs (December 15, 2008). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 74, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1316387

Contact Information

Lars Noah (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352-273-0923 (Phone)
352-392-3005 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/lars-noah

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,799
Downloads: 235
Download Rank: 85,719
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  383
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds