Male Circumcision as an HIV Prevention Strategy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Socio-Legal Barriers
Lawrence O. Gostin
Georgetown University - Law Center - O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law
JAMA, Vol. 300, pp. 2539-41, 2008
Georgetown University O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law Scholarship Paper No. 18
UNAIDS and WHO recommend safe, voluntary male circumcision as an additional, important strategy for the prevention of heterosexually-acquired HIV in men in areas with high HIV prevalence and low levels of male circumcision. Comprehensive male circumcision services should include HIV testing and counseling, partner reduction, and male and female condom use. Yet, male circumcision can have deep symbolic meaning that could pose barriers to implementation. In some parts of the world, it is a traditional practice with religious or cultural significance, in others it is a common hygiene intervention, and in yet others it is unfamiliar or foreign. Consequently, the proportion of men who are circumcised varies from <5% to >80%, with an estimated 30-40% of adult men circumcised worldwide.
Confirming a number of observational studies, three randomized controlled trials in Africa have shown that circumcision reduces the likelihood of female-to-male HIV transmission by 50-60%, leading WHO/UNAIDS to conclude that the evidence is "compelling." Male circumcision is a relatively simple, inexpensive one-time surgical procedure that is cost-effective, but raises a host of ethical, legal, and human rights challenges.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5
Keywords: health policy, HIV/AIDS, circumcisionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 16, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds