Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (61)



 


 



Heller and Insurrectionism


Carl T. Bogus


Roger Williams University School of Law

December 16, 2008

Roger Williams Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 71
Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 253, 2008

Abstract:     
The most significant aspect of District of Columbia v. Heller is the Court's pronouncement that the Founders intended to guarantee an individual right to keep and bear arms. But there is another idea lurking in the Court's opinion with potentially great ramifications of its own: the idea that the Founders gave us a right to keep and bear arms as an ultimate check against governmental tyranny. This is an insurrectionist theory because it legitimizes a right of the people to be armed, potentially to go to war against their own government. The Court, however, so far, has embraced this idea tentatively and perhaps not irrevocably. Drawing on Burkean principles, as well as those of the Founders, this essay is a plea that the Court reconsider its endorsement of insurrectionism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 23, 2008 ; Last revised: April 30, 2009

Suggested Citation

Bogus, Carl T., Heller and Insurrectionism (December 16, 2008). Roger Williams Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 71; Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 253, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1316948

Contact Information

Carl T. Bogus (Contact Author)
Roger Williams University School of Law ( email )
10 Metacom Avenue
Bristol, RI 02809
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,123
Downloads: 278
Download Rank: 52,551
Footnotes:  61

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.875 seconds