SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (34)

Beta

 


 



Book Review: Forensic Identification and Criminal Justice: Forensic Science, Justice and Risk, by Carole McCartney

Andrea L. Roth
Stanford Law School

Edward J. Ungvarsky
affiliation not provided to SSRN



Law, Probability & Risk, Vol. 8, p. 55, 2009

Abstract:     
Judging only by its table of contents, Carole McCartney's latest book might appear merely a straightforward catalogue of cases and literature discussing the uses of forensic fingerprint and DNA identification technology in the criminal justice context. Upon closer examination, however, the reader encounters a powerful lens offered by McCartney through which to reveal modern society's unhesitant and largely unscrutinized embrace of these technologies. McCartney borrows the concept of the 'risk society', taken from the 1997 book Policing the Risk Society by R. V. Ericson and K. D. Haggerty,1 to describe how our burgeoning preoccupation with the identification and elimination of risk has fueled, and been fueled by, the use of ostensibly 'fail-safe risk technologies' (p. xiv).

McCartney's thought-provoking central thesis is that the emerging 'technological tyranny' borne of our obsessive desire for certainty and rectitude is deeply problematic. To begin with, the technologies are not as infallible as they seem, as evidenced by reports of malfeasance, contamination, misinterpretation, fundamentally incorrect scientific assumptions and inaccurate or misleading match statistics. The imperfections of DNA and fingerprint evidence, while in themselves not a reason to abandon the forensic use of such evidence, are particularly dangerous precisely because of their perceived infallibility. Second, even assuming the technologies are reliable, their unfettered use may threaten important values other than accuracy and security, such as privacy and fairness. Finally, the elimination of risk and pursuit of certainty are uniquely dangerous as proffered justifications for ever-more-oppressive social control measures-such as vast national DNA databases-because they can never fully be attained. In the end, the more we pursue certainty and security, the more we realize how uncertain and insecure we are. The more uncertain and insecure we feel, the more willing we are to sacrifice core liberal democratic values in the name of certainty and security.

Keywords: DNA, forensic science, complex scientific evidence, database, privacy

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: December 18, 2008 ; Last revised: September 16, 2009

Suggested Citation

Roth, Andrea L. and Ungvarsky, Edward J., Book Review: Forensic Identification and Criminal Justice: Forensic Science, Justice and Risk, by Carole McCartney (December 15, 2008). Law, Probability & Risk, Vol. 8, p. 55, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317441


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Andrea L. Roth (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-9212 (Phone)
Edward J. Ungvarsky
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 195
Downloads: 31
Footnotes: 34

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.141 seconds.