Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317522
 


 



The Free Radicals of Tort


Mark F. Grady


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

December 17, 2008

Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 11, pp. 189-218, 2004
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-20

Abstract:     
Rational and irrational people are typically held to an identical tort standard when it is a question of their own liability. On the other hand, when it is a question of whether someone else has encouraged some dangerous behavior, as under the doctrines of duty and proximate cause, the encouragers will be liable only when the persons were part of a group whose members typically lack rationality. The courts' apparent purpose is to prevent accidents in every way possible even if it means diluting the incentives of irrational people in order to increase the incentives of responsible people to refrain from creating tempting opportunities for them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Tort law, doctrine of duty and proximate cause, the EFR doctrine

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 19, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Grady, Mark F., The Free Radicals of Tort (December 17, 2008). UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-20; UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317522

Contact Information

Mark F. Grady (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1856 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 645
Downloads: 88
Download Rank: 174,155

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.343 seconds