The Free Radicals of Tort
Mark F. Grady
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
December 17, 2008
Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 11, pp. 189-218, 2004
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 08-20
Rational and irrational people are typically held to an identical tort standard when it is a question of their own liability. On the other hand, when it is a question of whether someone else has encouraged some dangerous behavior, as under the doctrines of duty and proximate cause, the encouragers will be liable only when the persons were part of a group whose members typically lack rationality. The courts' apparent purpose is to prevent accidents in every way possible even if it means diluting the incentives of irrational people in order to increase the incentives of responsible people to refrain from creating tempting opportunities for them.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38
Keywords: Tort law, doctrine of duty and proximate cause, the EFR doctrineAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 19, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds