Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317623
 
 

References (70)



 


 



The 'Bush Doctrine' as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy


Mark Rigstad


Oakland University

June 2009

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, No. 3, June 2009

Abstract:     
Even if preventive military counter-terrorism may sometimes be ethically justifiable, it remains an open question whether the Bush Doctrine presents a discursively coherent account of the relevant normative conditions. With a view towards answering this question, this article critically examines efforts to ground the morally personifying language of the Bush Doctrine in term of hegemonic stability theory. Particular critical attention is paid to the arguments of leading proponents of this brand of game theory, including J. Yoo, E. Posner, A. Sykes, and J. Goldsmith. When examined in their terms, the Bush Doctine is best understood as an ethically hypocritical and shortsighted international discursive strategy. Its use of moralistic language in demonizing 'rogue states' for purely amoral purposes is normatively incoherent and discursively unsustainable. If it is a strategically rational piece of international communication, it seems designed to undermine globally shared normative meanings for the sake of short-term unilateral military advantage.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Bush Doctrine, hegemony, game theory, discourse strategy

JEL Classification: N40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 19, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Rigstad, Mark, The 'Bush Doctrine' as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy (June 2009). Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, No. 3, June 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1317623

Contact Information

Mark Rigstad (Contact Author)
Oakland University ( email )
Rochester, MI 48309-4401
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.JustWarTheory.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,401
Downloads: 200
Download Rank: 84,233
References:  70

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.329 seconds