Change and Continuity in International Antitrust under an Obama Administration
D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida - Levin College of Law; George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center
January 12, 2009
Global Competition Policy Magazine, January 2009
University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-13
The Obama administration inherits an international antitrust situation that is relatively better than the one that the Bush team inherited. Antitrust coordination and cooperation with agencies around the world have never been better. There has been an emergence of best practices across a number of different areas, both substantive and technical. On these issues, I expect that there will be no significant shifts in priority, except perhaps a less forceful approach on monopolization issues. Cooperation and harmonization will continue as will the support of technical assistance.
On the margins, the US agencies may need to refine the message of competition so that market reform does not mean a lack of regulation, just better regulation that protects consumers from anti-competitive harm. Leadership changes may play an important role on a personal level and poor leadership may impact the ability to progress on many issues. International issues should remain a priority merely because of an ever increasing global role of China and other countries and an ever expanding European Union. Yet, the emergence of China and other countries onto the antitrust scene will create new challenges, which the current financial crisis will compound in terms of analytical harmonization about single firm conduct and the proper role of the state in the economy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: antitrust, international, law, economics
JEL Classification: K21, L40
Date posted: December 19, 2008 ; Last revised: September 23, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.218 seconds