Why the Brownlow Committee Failed: Neutrality and Partisanship in the Early Years of Public Administration
Alasdair S. Roberts
Suffolk University Law School
July 19, 1994
Administration and Society, 28.1 (May 1996), pp. 3-38.
In 1938, Congress rejected a package of administrative reforms that had been developed by a committee of academics headed by Louis Brownlow. The defeat was the worst that President Roosevelt would suffer in three terms as President. This article suggests that the Brownlow Committee contributed to the debacle in Congress by ignoring evidence that its recommendations would prove contentious. It is argued that the committee members were caught in a dilemma: On the one hand, they wanted to obtain immediate reforms for a president to whom they felt a personal loyalty; on the other, they needed to maintain a demonstration of neutrality, which made it difficult to undertake the tasks of political management that were essential to craft a viable reform program. The demonstration of neutrality was a combination of arguments and routines that the academic community had invented to allay public skepticism about its members' trustworthiness as advisers on contentious issues.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
Keywords: public administration, Roosevelt, reorganization, expertise, rhetoric, New DealAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 21, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.609 seconds