Abstract

 
 

References (25)



 


 



Why There is Debate over Labor Market Institutions: A Perspective on Long-Term Unemployment Rate


Hong Ding


affiliation not provided to SSRN

December, 22 2008

Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2008

Abstract:     
This paper tests economic impacts of labor market institutions on employment of OECD nations from the perspective of long-term unemployment rate (LUR) in order to alleviate endogeneity bias existed in the current literature on this topic, which is the root of the long-lasting debate over significance of these effects. Based on careful analysis of the model specifications of past literature, a set of models with dependent variable of LUR are subject to various robustness tests and compared with other models in literature, policy simulation is then conducted based on the best specification after these tests. We find that some institutions, particularly tax wedge, union density and their interaction do affect LUR, which has profound implication for institutions' impacts on standard unemployment rate and provide further evidence in support of deregulation view held by IMF.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: labor market institutions, deregulation, endogeneity, robustness test

JEL Classification: J48, J58

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 23, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Ding, Hong , Why There is Debate over Labor Market Institutions: A Perspective on Long-Term Unemployment Rate (December, 22 2008). Applied Econometrics and International Development, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1319346

Contact Information

Hong Ding (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 252
Downloads: 28
References:  25

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds