Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1321125
 
 

Footnotes (225)



 


 



The Ivory Tower Under Siege: A Constitutional Basis for Academic Freedom


Matthew Reid Krell


University of Alabama - Department of Political Science

December 27, 2008

George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (CRLJ), Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the Supreme Court held that public employees who speak within the scope of their jobs are not protected by the Pickering balancing test. The Court reserved the issue of whether academics, who may make controversial speech within the course of their academic work and suffer retaliation, are subject to the Garcetti rule. This paper outlines the current thinking of how the various academic freedom claims within the First Amendment play out, and then offers a new way to resolve such a case. Essentially, the university is seeking authority to breach the employment agreement because the professor was in compliance with the employment agreement. Judicial sanction of such an action eviscerates contract.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: academic freedom, First Amendment, Contract Clause, public-employee speech, Garcetti, Pickering


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 29, 2008 ; Last revised: December 26, 2010

Suggested Citation

Krell, Matthew Reid, The Ivory Tower Under Siege: A Constitutional Basis for Academic Freedom (December 27, 2008). George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (CRLJ), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1321125

Contact Information

Matthew Reid Krell (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - Department of Political Science ( email )
Box 870213
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0213
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,230
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 181,645
Footnotes:  225

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds